Back to Events
UFO

The Prestwick Airport Radar Incident

An air traffic controller at Prestwick Airport tracked a fast-moving, unexplained UFO on radar - triggering an urgent investigation. RAF air defence staff impounded the radar tapes. The incident was documented in MoD files released in 2010, which concluded 'no additional evidence' could corroborate the sighting.

February 1999
Prestwick Airport, Scotland
1+ witnesses

The Prestwick Airport Radar Incident (1999)

In February 1999, an air traffic controller at Prestwick Airport in Scotland tracked something extraordinary on radar - a fast-moving, unexplained object that defied identification. The sighting triggered an urgent investigation. RAF air defence staff arrived and impounded the radar tapes. When Ministry of Defence files were released in 2010, the incident was documented among them - though investigators concluded “no additional evidence” could corroborate what the controller had tracked. The case represents the classic pattern of radar confirmation followed by official investigation and classification.

The Incident

What Occurred

February 1999:

  • Air traffic controller on duty
  • Prestwick Airport, Scotland
  • Fast-moving object detected on radar
  • Not matching any known traffic
  • Unexplained return tracked
  • Controller reported immediately

The Object

What radar showed:

  • Fast-moving target
  • Speed exceeding normal aircraft
  • Unexplained behavior
  • Not correlating with flight plans
  • Anomalous characteristics
  • Clearly not conventional traffic

The Response

Immediate Action

What happened:

  • Urgent investigation triggered
  • RAF air defence notified
  • Staff dispatched to Prestwick
  • Situation treated seriously
  • Not dismissed as malfunction
  • Full response activated

The Impoundment

Evidence secured:

  • RAF staff impounded radar tapes
  • Official seizure of data
  • Evidence chain established
  • Recordings preserved
  • Classified as sensitive
  • Removed from airport

The Investigation

What We Know

From released files:

  • MoD documented the incident
  • Part of official UFO files
  • Investigated seriously
  • Resources committed
  • Analysis conducted
  • Conclusions reached

The Verdict

Official conclusion:

  • “No additional evidence”
  • Could not corroborate sighting
  • Case closed without explanation
  • Radar data not conclusive?
  • Or evidence insufficient?
  • Questions remain

MoD Files

2010 Release

When it became public:

  • Ministry of Defence file release
  • Incident among documents
  • Previously classified material
  • Public disclosure under FOI
  • Part of broader UFO disclosure
  • Scottish incident included

What Files Showed

The documentation:

  • Incident confirmed as real
  • Investigation confirmed
  • RAF involvement documented
  • Serious response evident
  • Despite “no evidence” conclusion
  • Something happened

The Location

Prestwick Airport

The setting:

  • Major Scottish airport
  • International traffic
  • Advanced radar systems
  • Professional controllers
  • Critical infrastructure
  • Experienced personnel

Air Traffic Control

The witnesses:

  • Trained radar operators
  • Professional observers
  • Know what normal looks like
  • Can identify aircraft types
  • Experienced with anomalies
  • This was different

The Pattern

Radar Confirmation Cases

Similar incidents:

  • Controllers tracking unknowns
  • Official investigation triggered
  • Evidence impounded
  • Cases classified
  • Later released partially
  • Pattern of response

The UK Context

British UFO policy:

  • MoD maintained UFO desk
  • Serious investigation protocol
  • Military involvement standard
  • Files accumulated over decades
  • Eventually released
  • Prestwick among them

Questions

What Triggered Response?

The mystery:

  • Why was this escalated?
  • What made it urgent?
  • Why impound tapes immediately?
  • What did RAF expect to find?
  • Why air defence involvement?
  • More serious than admitted?

The Conclusion Gap

What’s missing:

  • Radar data not explained
  • Object not identified
  • Controller’s observation stands
  • “No evidence” yet investigation
  • Contradiction unexplained
  • Case neither solved nor dismissed

The Question

February 1999. Prestwick Airport. Scotland.

An air traffic controller is watching the radar. Routine shift. Flights coming and going. The familiar green sweeps of the scope.

Then something appears.

Fast-moving. Faster than it should be. Not matching any flight plan. Not answering any call. Just there. Moving across the screen at impossible speed.

The controller reports it. This isn’t normal. This requires investigation.

The response is swift.

RAF air defence sends staff to Prestwick. They don’t dismiss it. They don’t wait. They come immediately.

And they impound the radar tapes.

Whatever was on those recordings, the military wanted them. Wanted them secured. Wanted them classified.

Years pass.

  1. The Ministry of Defence releases UFO files. Thousands of pages. Decades of incidents.

And there it is. The Prestwick incident. February 1999. Documented. Confirmed. Investigated.

The conclusion? “No additional evidence could corroborate the sighting.”

But they impounded the tapes.

They sent RAF air defence staff.

They took it seriously enough to investigate.

And all we get is “no additional evidence.”

What did that controller see on his scope?

What was moving that fast over Scotland?

And what’s on those impounded tapes that we’ve never seen?

Prestwick.

Something crossed the radar.

Someone came for the evidence.

And the files say nothing happened.

But something did.

The controller knows.

The RAF knows.

We just don’t.