Back to Events
UFO

Chiles-Whitted UFO Encounter

On July 24, 1948, Eastern Airlines pilots Clarence Chiles and John Whitted observed a cigar-shaped craft with two rows of windows pass their DC-3 at close range near Montgomery, Alabama. They reported the object was about 100 feet long with a flame trail. The Air Force investigation couldn't explain the sighting.

1948
Montgomery, Alabama, USA
3+ witnesses

The Chiles-Whitted encounter was a landmark early UFO case. Two experienced airline pilots observed a structured, cigar-shaped craft with apparent windows pass their aircraft at close range. Their detailed, consistent testimony - and the failure of investigators to explain what they saw - contributed to the early credibility of the UFO phenomenon.

July 24, 1948

Eastern Airlines Flight 576 was a DC-3 passenger flight from Houston to Atlanta, piloted by Captain Clarence S. Chiles and First Officer John B. Whitted. Both were experienced pilots - Chiles with over 8,500 flight hours.

Time: Approximately 2:45 AM.

Location: Near Montgomery, Alabama, at about 5,000 feet altitude.

Conditions: Clear, moonlit night with excellent visibility.

The Encounter

The pilots’ account was detailed and consistent:

Initial Sighting: Chiles first spotted a bright light approaching from ahead and slightly to their right.

Closing Speed: The object approached at tremendous speed, estimated at 500-700 mph.

Close Pass: It passed approximately 700 feet to the right of the DC-3.

Duration: The entire observation lasted about 10-15 seconds.

The Object Described

Both pilots provided remarkably consistent descriptions:

Shape: Cigar-shaped or torpedo-like, with a pointed nose.

Size: Approximately 100 feet long and 25-30 feet in diameter.

Windows: Two rows of bright, square windows along the side, glowing with light.

No Wings: No visible wings or control surfaces.

Flame: A bright orange-red flame or exhaust trailing from the rear, 30-50 feet long.

Glow: The body seemed to glow along its underside.

The Pass

As the object approached and passed:

Near Collision: Both pilots initially thought collision was possible.

Evasive Action: Chiles pulled the DC-3 sharply to the left.

Wake Turbulence: The aircraft was buffeted by turbulence in the object’s wake.

Ascent: After passing, the object pulled up sharply and climbed out of sight.

Passenger Witness

One passenger corroborated the sighting:

Clarence McKelvie: Was awake and saw a bright light flash past the aircraft.

Confirmation: His observation supported the pilots’ account.

Limited View: From his seat, he couldn’t see the object’s details.

The Investigation

Project Sign conducted an extensive investigation:

Pilot Interviews: Both pilots were interviewed separately and together.

Consistency: Their accounts matched in all significant details.

Credibility: Investigators found both men highly credible.

Analysis: Technical experts attempted to identify the object.

The Air Force Assessment

Project Sign’s analysis was significant:

Top Secret Report: Project Sign’s “Estimate of the Situation” reportedly concluded the object was extraterrestrial.

Rejection: Air Force Chief of Staff General Hoyt Vandenberg rejected this conclusion.

Destruction: The report was allegedly ordered destroyed.

Official Position: The Air Force’s public position became that the pilots saw a meteor.

The Meteor Explanation

The meteor explanation was widely criticized:

Pilot Experience: Experienced pilots know what meteors look like - they don’t have windows or pull up and climb away.

Duration: Meteors flash by in seconds; this observation lasted longer.

Structure: Meteors don’t have visible windows or show structural detail.

Behavior: Meteors fall; this object climbed.

Wake: Meteors don’t create turbulence.

Dr. J. Allen Hynek later called the meteor explanation “particularly strained.”

Pilot Credibility

Chiles and Whitted were ideal witnesses:

Experience: Combined thousands of hours of flight time.

Training: Professional observers trained to identify aircraft.

Reputation: Both had excellent professional reputations.

Consistency: They never changed their accounts.

Nothing to Gain: Reporting the sighting risked ridicule.

The Windows

The detail of the windows was particularly significant:

Both Pilots: Independently described two rows of square windows.

Illumination: The windows appeared to glow from within.

Detail Level: This detail suggested a manufactured craft.

No Precedent: No known aircraft of 1948 matched this description.

Other Sightings That Night

The Chiles-Whitted encounter wasn’t isolated:

Ground Report: A ground observer in Georgia reported a similar bright object around the same time.

Pattern: The sightings suggested a craft traveling on a consistent path.

Legacy

The Chiles-Whitted case became a foundation of UFO research:

  • Two highly credible professional pilots
  • Detailed, consistent descriptions of a structured craft
  • Apparent “windows” suggesting occupancy
  • Official explanation widely rejected
  • Contributed to the seriousness with which UFOs were regarded

The Larger Picture

The encounter occurred during a pivotal period:

January 1948: Captain Mantell died chasing a UFO.

June 1947: Kenneth Arnold’s sighting coined “flying saucer.”

July 1948: Chiles-Whitted encounter.

The summer of 1948 established UFOs as a serious matter, if not a publicly acknowledged one.

Whatever Chiles and Whitted saw that night - a craft with windows, a strange meteor, or something else - their testimony helped establish that something unexplained was in American skies.

Sources