The Smurl Haunting

Jack and Janet Smurl claimed that demons terrorized their family for fifteen years in their duplex home in West Pittston, Pennsylvania. The case, investigated by Ed and Lorraine Warren, became one of the most controversial hauntings of the 1980s and was adapted into a television movie.

The Beginning

The Smurls moved into half of a duplex in 1973, with Jack’s parents living in the other half. Strange occurrences began almost immediately: water pipes leaked, scratches appeared on surfaces, and an unpleasant odor pervaded the home.

The activity escalated over the years. By the mid-1980s, the family reported violent attacks, apparitions, and demonic activity.

The Phenomena

The Smurls reported seeing apparitions of various forms, including a hag-like woman, a black humanoid figure, and a pig that walked upright. They claimed to hear voices, experience temperature extremes, and smell foul odors.

The family also reported physical attacks. Jack claimed to have been sexually assaulted by a succubus. Janet reported being thrown around rooms by invisible forces. The family dog was allegedly thrown across a room.

The Warrens’ Investigation

Ed and Lorraine Warren investigated the case and concluded the family was being tormented by four spirits, including a powerful demon. They arranged for multiple exorcisms to be performed.

The exorcisms provided temporary relief, but the activity would always return. The Warrens remained involved with the case for years.

Controversy

Skeptics questioned the case, noting inconsistencies in the Smurls’ accounts and the lack of independent corroboration. Neighbors reported seeing nothing unusual. The family’s decision to write a book and cooperate with a TV movie raised questions about motivation.

Resolution

The Smurls eventually moved to another home. They maintained that their story was true and that they shared it to help others facing similar situations.

Assessment

The Smurl haunting remains controversial. Believers point to the Warrens’ involvement and the family’s persistence. Skeptics note the commercial exploitation of the story and lack of objective evidence.