Back to Events
Cryptid

Trunko: The Margate Sea Monster

Witnesses reported a massive white, furry creature battling two whales off the South African coast before washing ashore, where it lay for ten days before disappearing back into the sea.

October 25 - November 1922
Margate, South Africa
100+ witnesses

Trunko: The Margate Sea Monster

In October 1922, beachgoers at Margate, South Africa, witnessed something extraordinary: a massive white creature, covered in fur and possessing what appeared to be a trunk, battling two killer whales in the surf. The creature later washed ashore, where it remained for ten days before mysteriously returning to the sea.

The Battle

October 25, 1922

Witnesses along Margate Beach, on South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal coast, observed a violent struggle in the waters offshore. The combatants:

  • Two killer whales (orcas)
  • A massive white creature unlike anything they had seen

According to newspaper accounts from the time, the unknown creature:

  • Rose from the water repeatedly during the fight
  • Used what appeared to be a trunk to strike at the whales
  • Was covered in white fur approximately 8 inches long
  • Showed a lobster-like tail
  • Fought for over three hours

The “Daily Mail” and other publications reported the battle lasted three hours, with the mysterious creature repeatedly being driven underwater before resurfacing to continue fighting.

The Carcass

The Beaching

Several days after the battle, the creature’s body washed ashore at Margate Beach. According to witnesses, the carcass was:

  • Approximately 47 feet long
  • 10 feet wide
  • 5 feet high
  • Covered in 8-inch long white fur
  • Possessed a trunk-like appendage (5 feet long)
  • Had a lobster-like tail
  • Showed no visible head, blood, or bones

The creature became known locally as “Trunko” due to its distinctive appendage.

Ten Days on the Beach

The carcass reportedly remained on the beach for approximately ten days. Despite its remarkable nature:

  • No scientists examined it
  • No samples were taken
  • No detailed photographs were published
  • The only images are distant, unclear shots

Then, mysteriously, the carcass washed back out to sea and was never recovered.

The Evidence

Newspaper Reports

The primary evidence for Trunko comes from contemporary newspaper accounts:

The Daily Mail (December 27, 1924) Reported the battle and beaching, including witness accounts of the creature’s appearance.

The Wide World Magazine Published an account in 1925 describing the encounter in detail.

Photographs

Two photographs allegedly showing Trunko exist:

  • Both are distant and unclear
  • They show a white mass on the beach
  • No detailed features are distinguishable
  • Their authenticity has been debated

Witness Accounts

Multiple beachgoers reported seeing:

  • The battle offshore
  • The beached carcass
  • The creature’s unusual features

However, no formal interviews or depositions were recorded at the time.

Analysis and Theories

Globster (Decomposed Whale)

The most likely explanation is that “Trunko” was a globster - the remains of a decomposed whale:

  • When whales decompose, their blubber can appear white and fibrous
  • Decomposition can create structures resembling fur or hair
  • A detached whale penis could appear trunk-like
  • Cetacean carcasses can take on bizarre shapes

The “battle” witnesses observed may have been:

  • Orcas feeding on a whale carcass
  • The carcass being tossed by waves appearing to “fight back”
  • Witnesses misinterpreting normal cetacean behavior

Unknown Species

Cryptozoologists suggest Trunko could represent:

  • An unknown marine mammal
  • A surviving prehistoric creature
  • A unique species of large fur-bearing sea creature

Problems with this theory:

  • No fur-bearing marine animal approaches 47 feet
  • The lobster tail doesn’t match any known evolutionary line
  • No bones or blood were observed

Misidentification

The original observers may have:

  • Overestimated the size
  • Misidentified features on a decomposing carcass
  • Been influenced by newspaper sensationalism

Why No Scientific Study?

The greatest mystery may be why no scientist examined the carcass during its ten days on the beach:

  • Margate was not a major city with research institutions
  • Communication was slower in 1922
  • By the time scientists could have arrived, the carcass was gone
  • Local authorities may not have realized its significance

This absence of scientific documentation leaves the case perpetually unresolved.

Legacy

Trunko has become:

  • A fixture in cryptozoological literature
  • Featured in books on sea monsters and unidentified marine creatures
  • The subject of ongoing debate between believers and skeptics

The case illustrates the challenges of cryptozoology: compelling witness accounts, but no physical evidence, no scientific examination, and no way to definitively identify what washed ashore at Margate over a century ago.

The Question Remains

Was Trunko:

  • An unknown creature that science missed?
  • A decomposed whale misidentified by excited witnesses?
  • A newspaper hoax that took on a life of its own?

The South African coast keeps its secrets, and Trunko - whatever it was - returned to the depths from which it came, leaving only questions and faded newspaper clippings behind.